modern congregations and liturgical practice. In the mediaeval period the base are of the tower might well have been used as a choir and the east end as a sanctuary. If the monks were confined to choir and sanctuary with the lay congregation somewhat isolated in the nave and a long way from the altar this would not have been seen as a problem. The laity would not understand the Latin mass and, anyway, they would never have been allowed to get to close to the Priest and the “mysteries” of the eucharist no matter how the interior was configured. Post-Reformation practice, however, was to break down such barriers. Add in the dwindling modern congregations you have a situation where a nave marooned at the west end of the church such as you see at Penmon is an absurdity.
As you walk into the church through the south door with its pretty little cottage-style porch you turn right for the business end of the church which is of little or no interest to the church crawler and turn left for Norman part which certainly is of interest. This area is laid out rather like a very small museum. Unfortunately the lights were not working on my visit and I gather this has been the case for quite some time. The pictures you see here, therefore, reflect the miraculous ability of modern pro-am cameras to capture pictures in light that the human eye finds almost impossible. The camera has to compromise, however, with very high ISO settings so I am afraid my interior pictures are rather sub-optimal. I should have used flash on this occasion, much as I hate it!
The south transept is of particular interest. On its west and south sides it has Norman blind arcading with one or two of the pillars having decorative designs. Its east window, although of Romanesque design, is a replacement dating from the 1855 restoration. The old nave has a fine Norman arch connecting it to the tower. Both sides of the arch have decorative courses. The eastern face also has carved capitals including, on the south side, what appears to be that rarest and most enigmatic of motifs, a sheela-na-gig.
Within the nave is a marvellous square font. It is adorned with stylised decoration and is clearly pre-Conquest, It is, however, believed to have originally been the base of a churchyard cross now located in the south transept before being converted to a font in the nineteenth century. This is one of two such crosses here, the other being in the nave.
The church is part of a complex of buildings. The prior’s house, now privately owned, adjoins the south transept. That building in turn abuts the north west corner of the surviving monastic building range.
Finally, a warning. The priory s at the end of a long road that flirts with the coastline and in the Summer there are lovely views of the strait and all manner of watersports are enjoyed, The last few hundred metres of that narrow road is a No Parking zone. When you get to the priory you find an inviting parking area. There were no machines so I assumed, not unreasonably, that it is free. It isn’t. A young attendant buttonholed me and said it was ¢G3.50 to park. Which for perhaps a half hour visit to the priory is excessive. I don’t normally jib at parking charges but I have my limits and don’t like being exploited. I found a farm gateway a couple of hundred metres down the road and walked back. I am not recommending you do this but be warned.
|