often associated with fertility. Honestly, you couldn’t make some of this stuff up, could you? Except I have a strong suspicion that someone did just that. Somehow I think some monk got a bit over-excited when he was scratching away in his scriptorium. Anyway, let’s stick with the church’s own assumptions.
Pevsner rightly says that there is “not much to arrest attention” in the architecture. There was a Norman church here, probably cruciform in plan, but there’s nothing of this church visible today except, perhaps, in the masonry itself on the north side. Today’s church has a chancel, south aisle, north transept and west tower. The transept arch is probably reset Norman and so is the window just to the west of it. Otherwise it is what Pevsner describes as “Cornish Perpendicular standard” mostly dating from around 1485. The piers of the arches are in typical Cornish granite. There are the usual Cornish features of an aisle stretching as far east as the chancel and waggon roofs.
The best feature of the church is undoubtedly its collection of carved bench ends. There are thirty-three in all. Most date from the mid-sixteenth century and expert opinion splits them into two groups carved at slightly different times and in slightly different styles. A third batch date only from 1920 but are believed to be representative of the originals that they replaced. The subject matter is typically Cornish with a strong biblical element and with the idiosyncratic Cornish preoccupation with the Instruments of the Passion that can be seen in many other locations. Cornish benches on the whole lack the outlandish and often secular exuberance of those in, for example, Somerset. I think it is fair to make the sweeping statement that mining areas tended towards scriptural austerity in their churches, doubtless influenced by the harshness of the their working conditions and the ever-present danger of untimely death. Two, however, a drinking man and a sailing boat are very interesting indeed and superbly carved.
The fifteenth century font is a curiosity. It is carved from granite which explains the crudeness of the carving. Less explicable is the naivety of the decoration. It represents angels holding hands around the bowl with what can only be described as childish grins on their faces. Pevsner, describes it as “barbaric” (how he loved that word) and the church’s information boards rather mindlessly repeats the word. But really that doesn’t properly describe it. For all the world it looks like a child’s depiction of a game of a playground game. It is utterly charming but its naivety is reminiscent of the Norman era (see for example North Grimston in Yorkshire) rather than of the fifteenth century.
The pulpit is fine sixteenth century example. The rood screen too survived Reformation and Commonwealth, although it was restored in the 1907. The Church Guide, however, says that the nave portion is essentially unchanged.
|